Jim Nichols wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> Very nice pictorial tour of Brighton's attractions. Thanks for sharing.
> The 25mm pancake seems pretty versatile, and I don't see any evidence of the
> reported barrel distortion in your images.
It's certainly there. Nothing like WA on many digicams, but just
slightly worse than the OM 24/2.8 on 4/3. PTLens doesn't have a profile
for the DZ 25/2.8 yet, so I tried the one for the OM 24/2.8. It very
slightly under corrects, which is better than over.
It can be seen in several of the images with straight lines in them,
including the horizon, if one looks for it.
Most obvious example of where it is and isn't obvious is "INDEED", where
applying correction much improves the right edge, but equal correction
has little visual impact on the rest of the image.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Wajsman/Indeed.htm>
> I suppose some people just like to find a point to quibble over.
>
Yup.
For these images, no problem. For architectural work, it would be an
obvious problem.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|