Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Question about longish Oly lenses

Subject: [OM] Re: Question about longish Oly lenses
From: "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:08:44 -0700
Can't use manual focus with the 70-300?  Don't know where you heard that.  Lens 
even has a manual/auto switch on it (only Oly lens I've got with that feature).
Isn't always the easiest to get to critical focus (that small aperature), but 
it does indeed manually focus.

________________________________

From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Piers Hemy
Sent: Sat 7/19/2008 8:48 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Question about longish Oly lenses




I had not realised the 50-200 was so heavy, Nathan.  It doesn't feel so bad
on the camera, leastwise!  But it's a significant increase on the 70-300 for
sure.

Judging only from the paper specs, I would point out that it is relatively
slow (which I regard as even more important with long lenses, though IS will
help a great deal), and as far as I understand you cannot use manual focus
with the 70-300.  But (still judging from paper specs!) the price
differential between 50-200 and 70-300 is very significant!  It looks a
bargain.

If you care to look at a fellow countryman's review (with other opinions
added) try here:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/43/zd-070-300.html  the short version - he
likes it very much.


--
Piers
            

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Nathan Wajsman
Sent: 19 July 2008 16:12
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Question about longish Oly lenses


I am thinking about getting a longer lens for my E3, taking advantage of the
fact that my uncle from Florida is coming over in August and can "smuggle" a
lens bought with US rubles at B&H.

I have looked at the following 3 lenses:

- the 50-200mm has the best specs but also the highest price and I am not
thrilled by the 1 kg weight
- the 40-150mm is light but its range overlaps with the 12-60mm I already
have; but it is the cheapest of these 3
- the 70-300mm appears the most useful, as its range dovetails nicely with
the 12-60. It is also light for this focal length, and inexpensive.

What is the opinion of this esteemed group of the relative merits of these
last two lenses?

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> 
http://www.greatpix.eu <http://www.greatpix.eu/> 
http://www.nathanfoto.com <http://www.nathanfoto.com/> 

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog





==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com <http://www.zuikoholic.com/> 
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com <http://www.zuikoholic.com/> 
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================





This message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.  
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may 
constitute a violation of law.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to 
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system.  If you 
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender 
immediately. 
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
-- File: winmail.dat


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz