You've shown these before but I hadn't previously noticed that (except
for the Vivitar f/8) the results could be interpreted as Zuiko is the
winner or else lens speed is the winner. At f/8 the Zuiko is 2/3 stop
faster than the Bausch & Lomb and a full stop faster than the Celestron.
Can you be certain that the faster shutter speed presumably used with
the Zuiko is not the cause of the sharper image (of live birds swaying
in a treetop)?
Chuck Norcutt
Jan Steinman wrote:
>> From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Can anyone please point me to a reference source in which
>> comparisons are
>> made, and opinions offered, of images taken with dedicated Olympus
>> digital
>> lenses and with OM Zuiko film camera lenses?
>
> Not quite what you're looking for, but two OM/E studies I did might be
> useful:
> http://www.Bytesmiths.com/OM_Tele
> http://www.biofos.com/cornucop/opage_1.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|