That was actually a goof--I meant to send the link to myself for later
reading.? One list member found the Tam SP F2.8? 35-105? wanting in the corners
until stopped down more than he liked.? I wanted to familiarize? myself with
the flavors of the AT-X 2.8 series.? Thanks for your informative comments and I
now consider it a? fortuitous error.
Mike
Not much of a reference. Left out the lovely, build, feel and image
quality, 24-40/2.8 AT-X. Perhaps outside the range of interest, but the
60-120/2.8 AT-X, another excellent performer, also deserves a mention as
part of the AT-X f2.8 series.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|