Subject: | [OM] Re: ZD 50-200mm Bokeh (was The rattlesnake) |
---|---|
From: | "iwert bernakiewicz" <zuikooh@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:09:10 +0200 |
>From what I've heard the new one is not better in the Bokeh department. That's why I keep the old 40-150 which has very nice bokeh, albeit a bit softer at the long end (certainly in combo with the 1.4 TC). The OM 100f2 coupled with 1.4 TC offers 140mm (280, that's a lot) and even better bokeh :) Now stabilized with the E-3! Iwert 2008/7/2 Wiliam Wagenaar <wiliam@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > - Does the new SWD version of this lens show better bokeh? > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 26: Amsterdam, Maastricht and l ots of seņoritas, Natan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: IMG: Nathan's PAW 26 : Amsterdam, Maastricht and l ots of se ņoritas, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 50-200mm Bokeh (was The rattlesnake), Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | [OM] A cool image from my Olympus camera, Chris Crawford |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |