Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: T45 Flamethrowers - ANTENNA PARTS #

Subject: [OM] Re: T45 Flamethrowers - ANTENNA PARTS #
From: "Johann Thorsson" <johann@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:14:02 -0700
I got this from Digi-Key (http://digikey.com) as I said in my previous reply 
to Chuck.  You need to buy both the antenna and the antenna base:

Antenna: ANT-433-CW-RH (http://tinyurl.com/6zg4uz)
Base: CONREVSMA004 (http://tinyurl.com/6qb3fv)

Beside making your remotes much more pro looking than if using wires, it is 
much more rugged.  There are other variants to this antenna modification if 
you don't want to put any money into it, or if you don't want to have some 
wire sticking out of your transmitter.  Here is one that I would e.g. 
consider: http://tinyurl.com/4kugtp

I  have had not autofiring problems with the 16channel versions, and after 
this antenna mod on the 4 channel units, they have behaved much better than 
before.

J

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 06:53
Subject: [OM] Re: T45 Flamethrowers


>
> I have three sets of RD616 units. You still get a LOT of false triggers 
> when
> you have two receivers in close proximity.  How close?  Well, usually, I 
> do
> a three-light portrait setup and can get away with it--but not always.
> Anything closer than 3 meters will usually give me an occasional false
> flash.  But in a previously mentioned venue, I've had one trigger another
> with a spacing of 20 meters.
>
> I myself will be looking for the 433 MHz antennas.  What an excellent 
> idea.
> I modified one of mine with a hoop of 12-gauge wire.  Works great, but
> unfortunately, it ended up ripping the trace on the circuit-board.  My
> feeble attempt to modify a second transmitter resulted in a hack-job worse
> than a  I like Johann's configuration MUCH better.  I will do the same.
>
> As to increase in distance, Chuck?  Well, under ideal conditions, I can 
> get
> the stock unit to reliably trigger up to 30 meters.  But in my testing, 
> even
> my jerryrigged unit gave me solid results up to 100 meters.  Probably
> farther, but my neighborhood didn't have a straight street long-enough to
> verify.
>
> Now for the really bad news.  The 16-channels are effectively 1 channel. 
> I
> have tried changing the channel on my transmitters to build "groups" of
> flashes or something as simple as changing the channel to disable the
> external flashes without having to disconnect the transmitter from the
> camera.  Changing channel assignments is no guarantee of channel 
> isolation.
> I fought this at a big event recently and finally got so frustrated that I
> ended up just removing the transmitter most of the time.
>
> Quote from "The Birds":  "Why are they doing this? Why are they doing 
> this?
> They said when you got here, the whole thing started. Who are you? What 
> are
> you? Where did you come from? I think you're the cause of all this. I 
> think
> you're evil! EVIL!" - Doreen Lang
>
> AG
> http://www.zone-10.com
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ============================================== 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz