I've been too busy with other stuff since I returned but I do need to
get back to the T-32 question and resolve the operational problems with
auto mode. Even if I don't use it I want to understand it.
It's interesting that you had to use f/5.6 when the flash was set for
f/4. The opposite of what I experienced although that might be a
different case altogether since it was at the extreme range of the
flash's capability.
DP review reports measured ISO sensitivity in their tests and notes that
the 5D is 1/3 stop more sensitive that the indicated ISO. Doesn't make
any difference when using the camera's own meter but I always compensate
when using an external flash meter.
Dr. Flash
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Tried T32 in auto on Canyon G-9 in auto at Iso 80-100 in manul camera
> mode. On f4 auto generally had to use 5.6 aperture for good exposure
> by sight and histo .? It worked in smallish room with normal ceiling
> height at 45 degT32 ?and Sto-fen diffuser.? Seemed to work OK varying
> distance to subject by a stop or 2 as best as I recall.? Needed to
> drag the shutter as per Dr. Flash's eloquent instructions a few years
> back.? I think you mentioned the 5D at iso100 acted closer to 125.? I
> was a bit surprised by the stop difference required in the settings.
> but it was eminently nicer than the harsh on board flash at those
> distances.? Immediate feedback certainly shortens the learning curve
> to think like a thryister taking the background into account. . Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Last night was my granddaughter's 8th grade graduation ceremony.
> Since I had no knowledge of the place or where I might be positioned
> with respect to the action at any given time I decided that shooting
> auto mode flash might allow me to react to changing conditions a
> little faster than my normal manual mode shooting. My Canyon 540EZ
> has a 7 stop manual range but no flash controlled auto mode. The
> T-32 has only full and 1/4 power but does have an auto mode. So the
> 540EZ stayed home and the T-32 got assigned to the flash bracket.
>
> In a nutshell I was very disappointed. Before the ceremony started I
> approached the stage and podium as closely as I thought I'd be
> allowed which was about 25 feet (8 meters). I had the T-32 set for
> ISO 400 and aperture f/8. My test shot showed that I actually needed
> f/5.6 on the camera. To make a long story short, long before the
> night was over I ultimately discovered that, with no changes to the
> flash setting, I was forced to apply manual exposure corrections by
> using from f/5.6 to f/16 on the camera depending on the distance. I
> think I'd have been better off with the 540EZ in manual mode. This
> was very surprising. I was prepared for auto mode to make 1 stop
> errors which I could easily correct in post processing but I wasn't
> prepared for 3 stop errors or a 4 stop range from low to high.
>
> Anybody have similar results with a T-32? My guess is that it would
> have been fairly well on the mark had I been shooting in a modest
> size room with a low ceiling. But I really did think it would do
> better than it did. Faulty T-32? I have 5 of them so can try the
> experiment again but not in the same venue.
>
> Dr. Flash
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version:
> 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1516 - Release Date: 6/24/2008 7:53
> AM
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|