JPG lost a lot of readers from the transition.
However, I am sure it recovered. I deleted my account
early on but for some reason I still receive emails. I
find myself checking them out and found some
interesting info on upcoming contests and events.
I came very close to getting a photo printed in JPG
but that was the one and only time. I never submitted
after that.
--- Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes? I got the idea from their "History' section
> that there'd been a
> palace coup somewhere along the way - the original
> couple who
> published used Lulu I noted; most interesting. Their
> original role
> was mentioned briefly without embellishment or
> detail, usually an
> indicator that the transition was difficult.
> Anyway, it still sounds friendly and not too
> daunting - it's a bit
> choked up with crap photography but at least you
> don't feel deterred
> by the competition!
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 23/06/2008, at 1:46 AM, AS wrote:
>
> > JPG used to be so much better when the original
> > founders were running the show. Somehow they were
> > duped by the present publisher/owner who ended up
> > taking ideas from the founders and then ousting
> them.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|