Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/06/2008, at 5:42 AM, Robert Burnette wrote:
> The President didn't start the Iraq War. Congress did. He isn't
> keeping us there. Congress is.
No, but it would be nice if you could elect and accept someone who is
prepared to lead.
>
> The President isn't responsible for global warming(?) either. There
> are reputable scientists on both sides of this issue. (No argument,
> just stating a fact.)
Not exactly, unless you have an unusual definition of 'reputable'.
The term scientist covers a lot of ground and the division within the
atmospheric scientist community is between 'certain' and 'cautiously
convinced'. Those who are raising questions (as they should) tend to
be other kinds of scientist who are not necessarily more informed
about the topic than any intelligent individual, apart from their
understanding of scientific method. And there are other non-expert
commentators, intelligent or otherwise. As Gore so neatly pointed
out, it's the journalists who are divided. And Bush would prefer to
listen to Michael Crichton of course.
I prefer a Pascal's Wager approach - if global warming is an
erroneous concept or not the monster that we fear, then so what?
If we do something, we improve air quality and reduce resource
consumption.
Win.
On the other hand, if it IS what we fear and we do nothing, our
children and their children have some serious social adjustment ahead.
Lose.
I'll leave you to work out the other two positions.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|