Scott,
Thanks for looking. I've got to learn to use the E-510 and the 14-54 before
I invest in a long lens. The 70-300 sounds interesting.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:29 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Experimenting with the E-510
> Looks pretty great to me for 5% of the image, I've been using the 70-300
> with EC 14 for a tele, but have it on the E330 and a tripod or surface
> to rest it on is needed for anything at that magnification as there
> isn't any IS.
>
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> After trying a longer, manual lens, I went back to the 14-54 2.8-3.5
>> lens to learn more about the camera. The linked image was made using ISO
>> 800, IS "on", at 54mm, recorded in RAW, processed in RAW, cropped
>> severely, and saved and uploaded as a tiff file. I feel that, even
>> though this is about 5% of the recorded image, the details come through
>> because of the use of RAW and tiff.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Camera+Alert.tif.html
>>
>> Any comments, other than save for a longer lens?
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|