swisspace wrote:
> Hmmm thanks for the replies - I hadn't considered the media costs only that
> if you factor in the inks the 3800 is not so much more expensive than the
> 2400 printer, I maybe should have asked a different question
> and perhaps asked for opinions from anyone using the 3800.
>
Bob Whitmire uses a 4800, which has the same max media size. Perhaps he
will weigh in.
I imagine he has considerably more practical experience with big Epsons
than anyone else here?
Here's info on the 3800/4800 differences.
<http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_epson_stylus_pro_3800.php>
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|