From page 286 of the D300 manual:
"Multiple exposures can be recorded at any image quality setting, and
produce results with colors noticeably better than photographs combined
in an imaging application because they make use of RAW data from the
camera image sensor."
I'm not sure I buy that but that's what they say. Sure is easier though
if nothing else.
Chuck Norcutt
Jim Couch wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> The D200 can also do this. I have to admit I have never tried it, seems
> to me to make more sense to do it in post processing. (of course I also
> felt the same way about double exposures on film so what do I know?)
>
> Jim Couch
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> <http://www.pbase.com/ed_k/apr_08_pad>
>>
>> Done with a Nykon D300. All of it is nice but what caught my attention
>> is the painterly looking images which are constructed in-camera using 10
>> multiple exposures per frame. This is something the D300 can apparently
>> do. Never hear of digital multiple exposures. A few look kind of funny
>> but others look very nice. I did locate the feature in dpreview's
>> coverage but had to do some looking. Is this just a common thing on
>> Nykon DSLR's?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|