Which is why you can mount most things on a 4/3rds body or an EOS
body - they have a smaller distance allowing room for an adapter.
Here's one for fun -
http://www.pbase.com/afildes/image/95819342
No OM content because it was shot by -
http://www.pbase.com/image/95819343
(In fact, they shot each other).
The list reminded me of how Leica made the screw mount lenses
compatible with M mount by building in one extra mm for an adapter.
They got a lot of things wrong and a lot of things strange but that
was good. It also shows why I can't mount Minolta on an EOS, damn.
Strangely Konica AR is missing - should be there around the 40mm mark.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/04/2008, at 5:48 AM, Leandro DUTRA wrote:
> Very interesting, it seems to be inversely proportional to the
> compactness of the OM bodies. While the Four Thirds, Pen F, Leica M
> and screw mounts flange focal distance is indeed small,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lens_mounts#Stills
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|