I didn't think to check the image profiles this morning, but I
suspected that they would both be sRGB. However, I have just had a
look at the 2 again, and the sand on the left part of the image is
warmer (or perhaps slightly darker) in the Firefox rendering.
What a mystery ... ;-)
Chris
On 11 Apr 2008, at 21:04, Moose wrote:
> Both images have a profile tag of sRGB. That means they 'should' look
> the same on any browser, colour aware or not. Firefox doesn't adjust
> for
> tags, but assumes sRGB, which they are. Safari reads the colour tags
> and
> renders them as sRGB.
>
> So actually seeing a difference in one and no difference in the other
> seems at least logically unlikely/impossible. I personally find it
> quite
> difficult to judge small colour differences between applications.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|