My understanding was that data was simply shifted between pixels, but not
that the sensor was being moved.
J
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:25
Subject: [OM] Re: My E-3 returns
>
> I had understood that the cleaning mechanism was what allowed the sensor
> shift IS possible, and why the cleaning would never be as effective as
> Oly's, because the sensor shif mechanism isn't capable of ultrasonic
> operation.
>
> Should I not read the web?
>
> Bill Pearce
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:03 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: My E-3 returns
>
>
>>
>> The sensor does not move with stabilization. It is a filter in front
>> of the sensor that moves.
>>
>>
>>
>> Winsor
>> Long Beach, California, USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On / April 7, 2008 CE, at 10:53 AM, Bill Pearce wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be that the stabilizing mechanism doesn't always park the
>>> sensor at
>>> the same place?
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|