| Subject: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:02:02 +1100 |
Epoxy and duct tape fixes that. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 05/04/2008, at 12:42 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > just for the sake of having built-in dioptric > correction that can't fall off the camera. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Sale of an Olympus legend, Jan Steinman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: 64-bit PhotoShop news, Jan Steinman |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability, John Hermanson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |