Subject: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:26:28 -0700 |
Leandro DUTRA wrote: > 2008/4/4, John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> OM-3 is very nice but it's circuit board is as complicated as an OM-4 >> > And me thinking it was fully manual! > Manual shutter, but somehow they needed electronics to do the multi-spot metering, TTL-OTF flash and Super-FP flash with the F280. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability, Gordon Ross |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Friday Song and Video - Charge across Europe, Bob Whitmire |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability, Gordon Ross |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability, Gordon Ross |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |