Don't ignore the possibility that the front cell with filter threads
might be shared with another lens. JH could possibly have the part or a
junker might be obtained which has a good front cell. I've tried this
filter ring repair one time. I did it well enough that the filter would
screw on with only a tiny bit of dragging but my repair was still
evident. Even if there is no perfect replacement it's possible one
could be cut down from a longer front cell of the same diameter. Here's
wishing you put this back into perfect condition.
Chuck Norcutt
Paul Yates wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks so much for all the hood ideas. I think I'll try to find the 24/2
> hood. I have a genuine metal hood for the 28/3.5 that I might try with a
> step-up ring, though I suspect it'll cause vignetting. I really must
> have an Oly hood to go with it. :)
>
> None of that can happen, of course, until I repair the filter ring. I
> already have my eye on a few of those "reverse vice" tools that are
> specifically designed for repairing the rings. I figure it is worth the
> investment, as I am getting more and more into doing my own lens
> repairs, conversions, etc. Luckily, the threads are not mangled so it
> seems that the repair should be relatively simple.
>
> The clamp-ons are a decent option, but I want to get into the lens
> anyway and attempt to clean up the haze, so the filter ring repair is a
> must and it will allow me to put the 24/2 hood on it.
>
> Part of me would prefer to send this lens to John (of Zuiko.com) as I
> know he would not only do a perfect job but also derive great pleasure
> from working on the lens. It's just that I'm feeling very much like
> Gollum with this lens.
>
> "My precious!"
>
> The other option would be to take it to International Camera Repair here
> in Toronto and have them correct the ring "while I wait". I really
> cannot imagine leaving it there alone.
>
> "One Lens to rule them all, One Lens to find them, One Lens to bring
> them all and in the darkness bind them."
>
>
> -Paul
>
> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>> On a 5D! - you have a few friends here.
>> The hood - The hood for the 24mm F2 would be the one as it has to be
>> designed for the minimum zoom range (only the brilliant 35-70mm F3.6
>> got around that problem). The one for the 28-48mm might do the job.
>> But, given the bent filter ring, that's a problem - the closest clamp-
>> on hoods are the rubber hoods for the 35-70mm F4 and 35-105mm but
>> they will almost certainly vignette on full frame. I can let you have
>> a 35-105mm rubber one if you feel like hacking yourself a rubber tulip!
>> Sigma made a range of 'Perfect' hoods - plastic tulips which will
>> clip in and wouldn't be bothered by the ding. There should be one at
>> 55mm width that will suit 24mm. One of the cheap Chinese ones offered
>> on ebay might do the job too. Those are trial and error solutions.
>> Best of all - any old lens repairer should have a neat reverse vice
>> device which will restore the rim to true round. As it opens, , irt
>> pushes the ring back into shape with minimum damage to threads and
>> anodised finish. It's worth getting it done right. Personally, for
>> the occasional rough repair, I made myself a set of wooden forms in
>> 49/52/55/58 sizes - with a small hammer and a shaped wooden flat peg
>> I can tap the ding out of most lenses to the point where I can mount
>> a filter. Sometimes the alloy is too hard though. It's a crude and
>> nervous approach - for a precious lens I'd get it done properly.
>> Andrew Fildes
>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30/03/2008, at 5:27 AM, Paul Yates wrote:
>>
>>> You're welcome!
>>>
>>> The first few samples I've shot show great performance at 24mm f8-f11.
>>> Sharp into the corners of my 5D.
>>>
>>> The haze/low contrast issue can be dealt with relatively well in
>>> PP, but
>>> I'd really prefer to clean it up.
>>>
>>> Some samples later, perhaps.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Paul
>>>
>>> Chris Barker wrote:
>>>> That looks very pretty, Paul. Thanks for the information and photos.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 29 Mar 2008, at 16:57, Paul Yates wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It has arrived!
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on my preliminary analysis and measurements, I can confirm
>>>>> with
>>>>> nearly 100% certainty that this lens is a prototype based on the
>>>>> design
>>>>> in the patent discussed earlier. In the patent, it states a filter
>>>>> size
>>>>> of "about 55mm". This lens has a 55mm filter diameter, which is
>>>>> simply
>>>>> one more piece of supporting evidence on top of what I discussed
>>>>> earlier.
>>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================
>>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ==============================================
>>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|