Subject: | [OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:42:25 +1100 |
Got a Not Found plus 403 Forbidden on the pbase page. FWIW on the original image. Colour, cool but not a problem, depending on the use. Wrinkles, etc. Looks fine, but she might prefer localised softening of crow's feet. Pose is a bit stiff - the set of the mouth rather determined - a cross between 'Bank CEO' and teeth clenched 'I don't want to be here'. I'd be tempted to fatten and relax the mouth a bit. :-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 26/03/2008, at 1:25 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote: > My result: > > http://www.bwp33.com/page17/files/page17-1000-full.jpg > > For giggles, I posted a link on the Lighting forum at DeePee, and > asked for comments. > > One fellow there offered the following edit of the picture: > > http://i.pbase.com/ > o6/67/398967/1/94507703.cGBTBwVK.ShutterBobpicofwife21Mar08edit.jpg > > Objective data: ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: #051, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Is This Thing Working?, Gordon Ross |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective, Bob Whitmire |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |