Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective

Subject: [OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective
From: Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:57:29 -0600
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Congratulations on having such a beautiful, photogenic wife.  An 
> excellent subject to practice on as you extend your repertoire to 
> portraiture beyond Rambo.  :-)

I'll second that.  And at least your wife will occasionally sit for a 
photo -- mine won't go near my lame studio attempts.

> I actually think you did a bang-up job.  Your correspondent's version is 
> a bit over the top.  I like to soften wrinkles but not remove them.  And 
>   making her skin look like she's a 23 year old Malibu beach bunny 
> doesn't quite fit reality.  Looking nice is different from looking fake.

Hmmmm.  I actually think both versions as presented are too physically 
small to make much of a call on this subject.  I do like your corr's 
warm version for its warmth.  Perhaps instead of aggressively removing 
wrinkles you could go for a very slight and tasteful "glam" filtering, 
such as an Orton effect.  Has the twin benefits of increasing the 
saturation (without changing the colour balance) and of softening the 
image.  Done on a second layer in Photoshop, you can do as much or as 
little of the effect as you need/wish.

If you need to selectively warm the image, Chuck's idea about masking 
the hair is probably your best bet.

(As an aside, where's Moose on this one?)


Garth

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz