Wayne Harridge wrote:
> I agree with the conclusion Moose, but this is a ZF (Zeiss Nikon F mount) not
> a Z (Zuiko)
Ah So, or should I say Jawohl?
> or ZD (Zuiko Digital).
I know it couldn't be that, no fit.
> It's a bit hard to tell without doing a side-by-side comparison but I'd say
> the ZD 50/2 is every bit as sharp and with better bokeh.
I've seen some about equally edgy bokeh with it too.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/GeeBee/07280.htm>
> The bokeh of the ZF is much better than the Zuiko 50/3.5 though.
>
A heart breaker. I've gotten bokeh with the 50/3.5 that is the visual
equivalent of fingernails on a chalkboard.
As a macro lens for copy work or with no back ground very far from the
plane of focus, superb.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|