Many years ago on 35mm OM's I almost exclusivley used 24mm (12mm E equiv) for
most of my rock
climbing and alpine trips. However I also liked 21mm and even 17mm and
ocasionally the 16mm
fisheye.
In pocketable p/s 35 cameras for climbing the XA and rollei 35 were nice in
size but not nearly
wide enough and I also used an even more compact Nikon p/s with 28mm lens.
Again not bad, but not
wide enough for my taste.
So a 12mm (24equiv) would probably still be my first choice, but anything in
the 10-12mm range
would work very well for me, especially if reasonably compact.
Tim Hughes
--- Leandro DUTRA <leandro.gfc.dutra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 2008/3/6, Tim Hughes <timhughes@xxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > I agree, sounds like this is the first small rock climbing DSLR, although
> > it still needs a
> compact
> > ultrawide at a reasonable price. Ideally at least a 14mm (28 equiv) but
> > preferably a 11 or
> 12mm.
>
> You mean at least a 14mm but preferrably 12 and ideally 11mm?
>
> --
> skype:leandro.gfc.dutra?chat Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
> +55 (11) 3040 7300 r155 gTalk: xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
> +55 (11) 9406 7191 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
> +55 (11) 5685 2219 MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|