Well, I probably am in my dotage but I'll blame the double message on
internet or Windows vagaries. The message sender seemed to be stuck in
a loop so I canceled out and did a resend later. It obviously had sent
the message even though it never claimed to have done so.
Chuck Norcutt
Piers Hemy wrote:
> But you know when you _are_ in your dotage because youi keep repeating
> yourself, eh Chuck? ;-)
>
> --
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Chuck Norcutt
> Sent: 04 March 2008 15:25
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Moose Monday v. AP
>
> Easy to say when you're not actually in your dotage.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Ian Nichols wrote:
>> On 04/03/2008, Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, the other writers I remember were Victor Blackman
>> Which brings about a bit of thread convergence. For some reason, his
>> comment when Canon brought out their first SLR with focus indication
>> has always stuck in my mind. It went something like this: "Even if I
>> were in my dotage, I would not need an electronic aid to tell me I had
>> focused an SLR correctly".
>>
>> I wonder what he'd make of all this modern stuff, and those Russian
> adapters.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|