Ian,
How's this?
<http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductDetail.aspx?groupsku=DO0799906845
1R&brandcategoryname=Digital&Mode=Digital&item=10&ActivateTOC2=&ID=13&BC
=DO&BCC=3&CC=7&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=>
Now if the price is right, we just have to figure out to get it
across the pond.
Charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ian Nichols
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:46 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Alternatives to ZD 50-200
Whilst my search for an affordable (by someone who's blown his photo
budget for this year on an E-3 & 7-14) used 50-200 continues, I'm also
considering alternatives..... which basically means the 75-300 and a
few of Sigma's range.
Their 55-200 is comparable in focal length range, but unlikely to be
an improvement on the ZD 40-150 I already have, except for the extra
50mm. Does anyone have any experience or opinions of their 135-400?
Something with a longer reach would be nice for motorsport and such.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|