Cogently put. Thank you. A lot of working pros are doing exactly as
you suggest, and it makes perfect sense. My work flow is a little
different. I may come back from a shoot with a lot of images, but
very few of them ever are going to make it past the Bridge Review
stage. Fewer still will make it into Adobe Camera RAW or Nikon's
Capture NX. I am never confident of either my abilities or my
understanding, so I tend to work from the very broad toward the more
narrow. That is, I start with Adobe RGB out of the camera and work my
way through RAW to .psd files in as many bits as are available. Only
toward the very end, when the technology starts demanding it, do I
feel comfortable narrowing the range of what I have. And even then
I'd rather not know my printer is sloughing off bits toward that 8-
bit output. In my case, ignorance _is_ bliss. <g>
--Bob Whitmire
www.bwp33.com
On Feb 19, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> the sRGB decision which is based mostly on a simplified work flow
> through to a lab generated print. YMMV.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|