Subject: | [OM] tokina 28-70 or 28-80 comments? |
---|---|
From: | James King <jking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:07:15 +0000 |
have any of you experience of the tokina 28-80 f2.8, tokina 28-70 f2.8 (constant) Tokina 28-70 f2.6-2.8? Any good, any better than the zuiko 35-70 f3.6? a while ago I tried the Tamron 35-105 SP f2.8 against my little zuiko and found the edges and the corners of the Tamron lacking. Not to mention rather more distortion than I was expecting.. James Companies Act 2006 : http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/companyinfo ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus re 12-60mm SWD "less than optimal autofocusing response", Daniel Sepke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: tokina 28-70 or 28-80 comments?, GMcGrath |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Maybe of interest to pinhole fans. Sorry, no Olympus content though., Ian Nichols |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: tokina 28-70 or 28-80 comments?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |