Nah, it needs the heavy grain to be "artsy"... or is that to be spelled
with an "f" as Bob has suggested many times? :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Bad? Looks like it belongs in the nearest art gallery.
>>
> I agree, that's a good looking pinhole image. Everything equally in or
> out of focus, depending on viewpoint, soft tonal graduations.
>
> There are two things going on in this image that have nothing to do with
> the pinhole. There is a lot of big grain. Not too bad elsewhere, but It
> seems too much in the sky to me, overwhelming the smooth pinhole look.
>
> Also, the histogram is quite unbalanced, with no pixels above about 215.
> Tame the grain and stretch the histogram to get some true highlights and
> it seems to me to be a really nice pinhole image.
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Smoothy/Pinhole.htm>
>
> Andrew had trouble with a Holgamods pinhole on his 5D, but this looks
> fine on film.
>
> Moose
>> photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> Not much of an image, but...
>>>
>>> Bought a pin hole body cap a while ago (from a site posted by Moose -
>>> holgamod I think) & just got round to developing the film, so in case
>>> anyone might be interested here's my second ever pin hole picture - best of
>>> a bad lot, need some more practice.
>>>
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6840646
>>>
>>> OM-1n, Rollei Retro 100
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|