Garth Wood wrote:
> whose wealth came about by pure accident -- a mere roll of
> the dice! -- instead of years of studying photography [programming].
What about the majority who've also done that, but are barely getting by
if at all? Must not be pounding the pavement hard enough as its always
possible to pound harder, or must just purely not be as good at it as
the successful ones, or might just suck at it. They can't be good,
talented, and not successful. (not even slightly true) You never see the
sucky ones in top jobs (also not true) taking undue credit for
satisfactory projects and "moving on before anyone finds out", etc. etc.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|