I didn't miss it. My question was specifically pertaining to what I
perceived long ago as Oly's implicit promise to do in-body correction
for specific lens abberations using the 4/3 interface. I don't know
that Oly isn't doing it since I don't have an Oly body. I don't know
that Canyon isn't doing it since I don't have any Canyon lenses. But I
don't think they're doing it or someone would be trumpeting it.
Chuck Norcutt
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> You may have missed it, but I gave you an example of in camera
> processing. Most digicams these days correct in camera for purple
> fringing and chromatic aberration. How do you know it is not happening
> in the Oly or even your own camera?
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On / January 11, 2008 CE, at 12:08 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Once again, post-processing is not exciting news.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Winsor Crosby wrote:
>>> I suspect that what they meant that the lens identifies itself and
>>> that in-camera or post processing knows the characteristics for that
>>> lens and can correct for it automatically, if needed. It is something
>>> other makers do as well. The Nikon Coolpix P5100 can be set to
>>> automatically correct for barrel distortion at the short end of the
>>> zoom. The Capture NX software has the characteristics of the 10.5mm
>>> fisheye lens embedded and can automatically correct without
>>> "eyeballing" it.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|