We're all glad we could help. You'll love your OM-2. I've been using the
OM-system since I was about 8 yrs old. My dad taught me to use his Olympus
camera back then and he got me one of my own when I was 11. My first was an
OM-G; I'm now shooting a couple of OM-4T bodies. I have collected from Ebay
several other cameras, Minolta's, Pentaxes, and others and I have a Nikon F4
that I got new years ago. None of them compare to the OM cameras in my
opinion; I can shoot faster and more accurately with my OM-4T bodies than
with any other 35mm I have used, including the expensive and heavy built
Nikon F4.
--
Chris Crawford
Photography & Graphic Design
Fort Wayne, Indiana
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS.
On 1/7/08 11:54 PM, "Amin Sabet" <asabet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris, Wayne, Jay and Moose for all the information. For now
> I'll continue with the 1-13. Perhaps I'll find the central aid useful
> in certain situations as Moose mentioned. Just curious - Is the
> peripheral matte area on the 1-4 any better for focusing than the
> peripheral matte area on the 1-13, or is the central part the only
> area in which they differ?
>
> Amin
>
> http://aminsabet.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|