But for all the chatter there it doesn't seem as though anyone else has
tried to empirically verify the claim. I guess I'm not worried about it
though. I don't think I've ever (deliberately at least) taken a shot
at some intermediate ISO level. I change ISO in full stop incremements
and do any exposure diddling with aperture or shutter speed. Changing
ISO is too fiddly on a 5D (or an A1) to bother with 1/3 stop adjustments.
Chuck Norcutt
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Oops, here is the link:
> http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/597010/1
>
> Interesting thread on FM:appears full stop ISO increments are
> implemented in the hardware sensor gain while in-betweeners are done in
> SW and noisier---Tsk, Tsk, Canyon. The lack of transparency on the
> issue is worse than the offense. How do you spell ISO-gate? Wonder how
> widespread this approach is?
>
> Mike
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://webmail.aol.com
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://webmail.aol.com
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|