Nice stuff. Do we get to see the lower ISO image too?
Chuck Norcut
Bob Whitmire wrote:
> For anyone interested, I just posted on the web site an image of
> Pemaquid Point Light taken with the D3, hand held, at ISO 6400. NEF
> file processed through ACR, post processing in CS3, and noise
> reduction via Neat Image.
>
> http://www.bwp33.com/page14/page14.html
>
> I've never worked at these ISOs before, and I'm sure I've got a lot
> to learn about postprocessing at that speed. Still and all, it's a
> usable image, though not one I'd put out for sale at my venues. (I
> took more at lesser ISOs and higher shutter speeds which will fill
> that need.) Shutter speed on this one was 1/50, and it was hand held
> (before muscle spasms), but on my screen, blown up to 200 percent, I
> can make out what the sign actually says. It's a little fuzzy cause I
> needed to be on a tripod, but I can still make it out.
>
> Furthermore, what I've heard said is true. Even at full noise the
> image is not unattractive. It really is more of a film grain effect
> that nasty splotches of color noise. Not that I'd want to extend the
> metaphor to silliness, but in the case of shot or no shot, the D3
> gives you the shot and makes it look pretty damn good. I'm not used
> to taking photos in light where I can barely see. <g>
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> Pumping Iron since 12-12-07
> www.bwp33.com
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>
>> Alas, it's true. I finally filled my empty threats and bought into a
>> different system. The name has a 3 in it, but the letter is not an E,
>> rather the letter which comes before it in the alphabet.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|