Thanks.
First there is much faster for 1/250" flash synchronization. Beside, I
found that the TTL is more accurate than OM. Sometimes TTL of OM was missing
to over exposure.
--
Michael
2007/12/22, usher99@xxxxxxx <usher99@xxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Always enjoyed your posts and images, Michael. Please continue to post.
>
> Wonder what you like about the Nikon flashes?
> I believe some list members have had good success using 3rd part
> flashes such as Metz 54 MZ3 or 4 (?Jez, IIRC) or even Quantum for fancy
> shamcy TTL powerful set-ups ---?X2 for OM if they desired other
> features than available with the T-series.
> I think there is powerful Sunapack that John Lind used to use, thouugh
> I cam't find his post now. I believe it did TTL, if you like that as
> well. If so, please don't say so loudly else Dr. Flash may hear.
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I was considering to switch to Hasselblad but I have to change my
> scanner & projector. Thus, I finally keep in 135 world. I'm still a
> slide
> film shooter & I appreciate high quality of ZF lenses & better flashing
> system of Nikon.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://webmail.aol.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|