I guess you didn't look at any Canyon offerings if you think the E-3 is
small in comparison. Here's a little table with dimensions in mm and
weight in grams w/o battery:
Camera Width Height Depth Weight
E-3 142 116 75 800
5D 152 113 75 810
40D 146 108 74 740
The 40D is the closest competitor feature-wise. It lacks the in-body IS
and the articulating screen for it's live view which is probably what
allows it to be a bit lighter than the E-3. But the E-3 is definitely
not small in comparison to its competition.
Chuck Norcutt
Chris Barker wrote:
>
> I meant that, for a large SLR, the E-3 is just great. I know that it
> probably looks quite small next to a Canyon offering, but it is still
> large and heavy when compared with the OMs and their lenses.
>
> But I do enjoy using it ...
>
> Chris
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|