Subject: | [OM] Re: Any comments on Zuiko Digital 35 or 50 macro? 18-180? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:30:30 +1100 |
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/301932-REG/ Olympus_261003_50mm_f_2_0_Macro_ED.html Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 27/11/2007, at 12:17 AM, Ian Nichols wrote: > Might as well get both: the 35/3.5 is a surprisingly capable lens > despite its relatively low price tag. The 50/2 is very nice and well > worth the money. The pair of them cost less than £500 here in the UK, > so must be loads cheaper in the rest of the world ;) ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Any comments on Zuiko Digital 35 or 50 macro? 18-180?, Ian Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Any comments on Zuiko Digital 35 or 50 macro? 18-180?, Ian Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Any comments on Zuiko Digital 35 or 50 macro? 18-180?, Ian Nichols |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Any comments on Zuiko Digital 35 or 50 macro? 18-180?, Ian Nichols |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |