On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 07:42:03PM -0800, Jan Steinman wrote:
> I did a comparison of a half-dozen OM macros on an E-300.
> Unfortunately, I did not include the ZD 50/2 in that bunch.
> http://www.biofos.com/cornucop/opage_1.html
Aw, I'm disappointed. Of the macros you tested, guess which one I own?
That's right, the 50/2. Not very contrasty at all. I'm underwhelmed, and
disappointed, given the results it delivers on an OM body.
Wonder how the 90/2.5 Tamron SP does? I've got one of those, the first
version (49mm filter, wide front ring), with the Adaptall extension
tube...have to give it a try and see what happens.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|