Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I somehow missed the things thing. Got lost in the tree and forgot to
> wend my way back up I guess. Haven't seen it all yet but I really like
> this one for reasons I can't put my finger on
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Brooklyn/Things/All%20Things/slides/_MG_3224.html>
> and this one
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Brooklyn/Things/All%20Things/slides/_MG_3234cor.html>
> and this one
>
A little more about this one. I suppose it's all those years shooting
slides and projecting them. A lot of people think once you've pushed the
button, that's it, what the camera, lens and processor give you is what
you get.
On that basis, this shot is a lost cause - and I would not be using the
lens I use. With cropping, lens distortion correction, perspective
correction and the other usual post processing, it's rather nice. (The
'original' is probably not quite as good as the full size, as I didn't
do any sharpening in the downsizing.)
http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/Brooklyn/_MG_3234.htm
Different tools, different rules, different results.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|