Yes, it is kind of funny that the 300/4.5 and the 400/6.3 are not in the
list of recommended lenses. I don't think the other longies (600 &
1000?) are in there either.
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
>> I don't recall seeing your pelican shot before with the 300/4.5. I
>> like it.
>
> Thank you. It was taken with Joel Wilcox' 300/4.5. An excellent
> lens and it remains one of my favorite Zuikos. The Bokeh
> characteristics of this lens are exceptional and the images are
> 3D'ish.
>
> I believe the reason why Olympus recommended certain lenses and
> aperture ranges is because of the failure to meter properly outside
> of those apertures. As long as you use manual-exposure or chimp for
> proper exposure-offset you'll be ok. But I am one to push equipment
> to the limits.
>
> AG
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|