Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> But you are more definitive in your statements than any lawyer would
> ever be. :-)
>
> But one question. Why is it that the person's image appearing in an
> illutration for an article in the magazine rather than an advertisement
> is not considered commercial use promoting the magazine rather than
> another product?
>
It's the law, and is not required to be either logical or fair.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|