Interesting comment, Larry. My old Lumix FZ-20 has a choice of
settings for IS: 1) let the IS work exclusively at the point of
capture; 2) let the IS work BOTH in the electronic viewfinder AND at
point of capture. I suppose it seems crazy not to use 2). There is a
downside that I can't quite recall (but I think it might be a bit of
delay at the shutter). In any case, I've always kept it set at 1) in
order to force myself to do as well as I can to minimize movement and
then let the camera improve on what I am able to do. It's always been
excellent at that.
Anyway, what you describe certainly fits what I am looking for in IS.
Joel W.
On Nov 9, 2007 4:56 AM, Larry <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The image steadying in the viewfinder is not automatically better for
> results than not. I don't mean the occasional dizziness some people
> feel. Even if you're lulled into thinking if you see it steady, it will
> be steadier - actually the opposite can be true often as not. If you are
> /not/ watching the stabilization working and are putting your usual
> effort into keep still (seeing only your own results of being still),
> the IS only makes it better. No false confidence causing you to not try
> as hard.
>
> Larry
>
>
> Moose wrote:
> > I could see the viewfinder image steady when it
> > kicked in - kewl. I shot three
> > shot sequences with and without VC on at various focal lengths and
> > shutter speeds. The results were quite disappointing, with the VC
> > disabled results holding a slight lead overall.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|