On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Moose wrote:
> Hey! Welcome back.
>
> I finally had time to spend looking at some of the images on your
> site.
> You've really been busy while out of touch here. While retaining the
> slightly quirky "eye" (a good thing in my book), you have broadened it
> and added improved technique and presentation. Congratulations!
Many thanks :)
<snip>
>
> On 11/4/07, siddiq@xxxxxxx <siddiq@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does anyone know if the upcoming 14-35mm/f2 will be internal zoom?
>> Really wish the 12-60 was, otherwise it's too conspicuous. the E10
>> has me spoiled. oh well. as soon as B/H has it.....
>>
>
> If you are concerned about it being too conspicuous for street
> photography, take a look at the first example in my new article at
> zone-10.com and all the people shots in my Brooklyn gallery. All taken
> with a 5D and a 28-300 lens that is very, uh... protrusive at 300 mm.
> The exact opposite of inconspicuous.
>
> Just don't try to take pics of small children in parks.
>
> Moose
Yea, just gotta get comfortable, and confident, and smile, if people
make eye contact out on the streets. As far as taking pics of kids,
however adorable, I either don't when I'm shooting solo, or leave it
to my fellow female photographer :D
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|