Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I agree that the diagonal isn't terribly useful but I chose it since I
> thought it was probably valid from a comparative standpoint and mostly
> because it was a number available to me without unlimbering the
> calculator. If you don't like my numbers you'll have to take them up
> with Oly and Canyon. My numbers came from the manufacturer's specs.
> The are, of course, just as accurate as the FL spec.
>
I didn't really want to disagree, but I did want to point out the issue
of sample variation, my numbers differed and I wanted to explain that.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|