Subject: | [OM] Re: E-3 vs. K10d |
---|---|
From: | Ali Shah <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:20:18 -0700 (PDT) |
IMO the K10d is right in line with the E-3. Typically these things are priced higher when they are introduced. The 510 hasnt experienced much of a price drop YET...because it is fairly new to the market. When I posted my thought...I wanted to compare the E-3 to the K10d rather than a N*kon or C*non offering because the K10d is a closer match (feature wise). Price is not an issue because the E-3 isnt even in the market yet...what you see is more MSRP pricing. Lenses - I give up!! They each have their own set of desirable lenses. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Totally nothing to do with the E3...., NSURIT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-3 Availability, AG Schnozz |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-3 vs. K10d, Sandy Harris |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-3 vs. K10d, Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |