I hadn't paid much attention to the details but, based on the wide angle
distortion of the bride in that shot, my guess is that it was made with
the 24-70 and not the 70-200. Making the bride seem wider than she is
is a no-no in my book. Apart from price, it's why I use a 28-80 instead
of a 24-70. Makes it harder to introduce accidental people distortion.
Chuck Norcutt
Richard Lovison wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Oops. Better give the link
>> <http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Some very nice, natural light wedding photography with the Nykon D3.
>>> Most shot at ISO 1600-6400. What? We don' need no steenkin' flash!
>
> Geezz, 6400 looks better than the E-1 at 800. That 70-200mm/2.8 seems
> to have incredible depth of field wide open. Is that possibly a misprint?
>
> Richard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|