You should read the link that Winsor posted:
<http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/lcd-response-time.html>
You will be somewhat more technically informed after the read but will
know much more about the manufacturer's intent to obfuscate the issue
via the use of gray-to-gray response time measures. Kind of like the
pixel race but with the ability to make your own definition of what
constitutes a pixel. Actually, I guess Foveon and others have already
walked that ground. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Garth Wood wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Good points all but I still don't understand this "response time"
>> number. For example, this Samsung 226BW claims a 2 ms response time.
>> <http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001096> What
>> does that mean?
>
>
> Just to complicate things further, many monitors, after quoting their
> response times, have the following phrase in parentheses (or as a footnote):
>
> "Grey-to-grey" (or "Gray-to-gray")
>
> which, I presume, is the time for the pixel to go from a middle grey to
> either black *or* white and then return to a middle grey.
>
> Clear as mud, no? ;-)
>
>
> Garth
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|