I had a D-Lux 3 - I gave up on it because it was too noisy at even
moderate ISO. I thought the D-Lux 2 was better for image quality at
low ISO too. If you can cope with smaller image size, you can save
some money.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 12/09/2007, at 11:12 PM, Leandro DUTRA wrote:
> So has the Leica D-Lux 3, which I am considering. Still it is nice to
> be able to uſe ſtuff fuller than the manufacturer firſt
> intended… even
> becauſe it is ſad to ſee that the hardware is capable of more
> than the
> manufacturers allow us to do with it.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|