On 9/1/07 6:24 PM, "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's kinda strange. I've started going back the other way. After
> producing a bunch of mega-images, I'm appreciating smallish B&W
> prints. Prints which are too large tend to drive people away from
> them, while smaller prints bring the viewer closer. One person, whom
> I think has this really figured out is Chris Crawford. His images are
> absolutely tops and I know that one of his 5x7 prints would easily
> trump most of my mega-prints.
>
>> Nice one. Very.
>
> Thank you, I really appreciate the addaboy. Some of us thrive on
> complements.
>
> AG
>
>
AG,
Yeah compliments are awesome to receive. Thanks for the compliment on my
work. I usually do print small, although I have done a few 11x14 prints that
were for an exhibit I was in a few years ago at an art museum in my hometown
in Indiana. They wanted some bigger prints because the exhibit was a charity
sale to raise money for the museum and they felt that large prints of some
of my landscapes would sell well. They sold ok, but I had used smaller
prints in this same exhibit in years past and the small ones sold better!
The big ones looked good from a technical standpoint; all had been shot on
tmax 100 in 645 format, so there was no grain and plenty of detail in the
big prints. But I feel that my work is intimate and often to much of a self
portrait to look 'right' big.
--
Chris Crawford
Photography & Graphic Design
Santa Fe, New Mexico
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com
http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|