>I don't understand this dislike of the "digital workflow". There's no
> reason why the digital workflow has to be any different than a film
> workflow unless you choose it to be. You can shoot JPEG's and drop off
> or send your digital images to your favorite processor just like you did
> with film. The only additional step (which is very easy) is to make a
> backup copy because you have no negatives.
>
> If you choose to retouch or "Moosify" all your images, well, that's
> something you couldn't do before unless you turned your film into a
> digital image with a scanner.
>
> Where's the beef?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
The difference for me Chuck, is that what I shoot with is 4/3 format, and
all the "favorite processors" (read cheap, like Walmart, etc.) print in the
35mm film format. So they either do their own auto-cropping of my pictures,
or else I have to do it all myself beforehand, one at a time. So it's not
quite a simple as the film workflow for me. Now mind you, for what I do I'm
not really upset about digital. I like some aspects of digital, and shoot
what I want with digital, and what I want with 35mm slides, and sometimes
still use some print film.
Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|