2007/8/27, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> But the Pentax K10D does give you DNG output. But, with batteries,
> about 50% heavier than an OM-1. Amazing lens compatibility though.
Yes, it does — besides the weight and all that, DNG is only part of
it; I value openness not only in software, thus 4/3. My ideal body
would be the Leica Digilux 3; until I can afford it or its successor,
I rest content with the E-510.
> But you could also take the Moose approach. You could use a 30D or 40D
> which is perhaps 75% heavier than an OM-1 but crank up the ISO to as
> high as 3200 such that you can use slow, light weight lenses.
Perhaps. But I really do like what I have, and I like the idea of
open standards, and I like their concept and idea of future.
I just do hope we will have high ISO sooner than later, hopefully as
soon as the E-1 successor.
--
+55 (11) 5685 2219 xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
+55 (11) 9406 7191 Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
+55 (11) 5686 9607 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|