I understand current legislation being considered (rewritten many times,
now with the input of a voting machine company :-( makes the paper
trail non-auditable.
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon dot net
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I've always thought the best system would be a hybrid. Computer
> controlled touch screen for easy presentation, selection and correction
> (if necessary) of your choices. But the computer would be stand-alone
> and not connected in any way to any network. It would print out a human
> readable paper form as the ballot. The paper form would be counted by a
> separate optical reader. No manual labor, paper ballots for safety and
> recounts.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Winsor Crosby wrote:
>> And the more people involved in counting the vote the harder it is to
>> steal the election. Paper ballots are good.
>>
>>
>> Winsor
>> Long Beach, CA
>> USA
>>
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|